<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Energy Medicine</title>
	<link>http://health-and-beauty.orlyowl.net</link>
	<description>Energy Medicine</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>BBC Business Daily Interview on Brain Drugs</title>
		<link>http://health-and-beauty.orlyowl.net/295-bbc-business-daily-interview-on-brain-drugs.html</link>
		<comments>http://health-and-beauty.orlyowl.net/295-bbc-business-daily-interview-on-brain-drugs.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Uncategorized</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">ngswp44722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted by Zack Lynch</b></p><p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/business_daily.shtml">I was interviewed today on the BBC World Service Business Daily</a> for my perspective on cognitive enhancers. </p><p>"We explore the controversial area of whether business people should use prescription drugs to enhance their brain power - we ask if, in future, it might be commonplace to pop a pill to focus your thoughts - but what are the risks right now?"  <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/business_daily.shtml">Take a listen</a> (will only be up for a week).  Then you'll need to find archives.  </p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/business_daily.shtml"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Posted by Zack Lynch</b></p><p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/business_daily.shtml">I was interviewed today on the BBC World Service Business Daily</a> for my perspective on cognitive enhancers. </p><p>"We explore the controversial area of whether business people should use prescription drugs to enhance their brain power - we ask if, in future, it might be commonplace to pop a pill to focus your thoughts - but what are the risks right now?"  <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/business_daily.shtml">Take a listen</a> (will only be up for a week).  Then you'll need to find archives.  </p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/business_daily.shtml"></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://health-and-beauty.orlyowl.net/295-bbc-business-daily-interview-on-brain-drugs.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Case for Legal Cognitive Enhancement by the Healthy</title>
		<link>http://health-and-beauty.orlyowl.net/294-the-case-for-legal-cognitive-enhancement-by-the-healthy.html</link>
		<comments>http://health-and-beauty.orlyowl.net/294-the-case-for-legal-cognitive-enhancement-by-the-healthy.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Uncategorized</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">ngswp44055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted by Zack Lynch</b></p><p><strong>In a bold 21st Century declaration</strong>, a group of intelligent, thoughtful and creative neuroethicists have come forward in this week's Nature with a issue defining article calling for the <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/456702a.html">responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy</a>.  Realizing that the age of <a href="http://www.corante.com/brainwaves/archives/2003/10/10/neurocompetitive_advantage.php">neurocompetition</a> is arriving, they (<a href="http://www.law.stanford.edu/directory/profile/27/">Henry Greely</a>, <a href="http://www.psychiatry.cam.ac.uk/pages/profiles/sahakian.html">Barbara Sahakian</a>, <a href="http://www.law.manchester.ac.uk/aboutus/staff/john_harris/default.htm">John Harris</a>, <a href="http://www.hcp.med.harvard.edu/people/hcp_core_faculty/ronald_kessler">Ronald C. Kessler</a>, <a href="http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/~gazzanig/">Michael Gazzaniga</a>, <a href="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/bios/campbell.html">Philip Campbell</a> &#038; <a href="http://www.psych.upenn.edu/~mfarah/">Martha J. Farah</a>) state their case and way forward as follows:</p><p>1.Based on our considerations, we call for a presumption that mentally competent adults should be able to engage in cognitive enhancement using drugs.</p><p>2. We call for an evidence-based approach to the evaluation of the risks and benefits of cognitive enhancement.</p><p>3. We call for enforceable policies concerning the use of cognitive-enhancing drugs to support fairness, protect individuals from coercion and minimize enhancement-related socioeconomic disparities.</p><p>4. We call for a programme of research into the use and impacts of cognitive-enhancing drugs by healthy individuals.</p><p>5. We call for physicians, educators, regulators and others to collaborate in developing policies that address the use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by healthy individuals.</p><p>6. We call for information to be broadly disseminated concerning the risks, benefits and alternatives to pharmaceutical cognitive enhancement.</p><p>7. We call for careful and limited legislative action to channel cognitive-enhancement technologies into useful paths.</p><p> "Like all new technologies, cognitive enhancement can be used well or poorly. We should welcome new methods of improving our brain function. In a world in which human workspans and lifespans are increasing, cognitive enhancement tools  including the pharmacological  will be increasingly useful for improved quality of life and extended work productivity, as well as to stave off normal and pathological age-related cognitive declines. Safe and effective cognitive enhancers will benefit both the individual and society. But it would also be foolish to ignore problems that such use of drugs could create or exacerbate. With this, as with other technologies, we need to think and work hard to maximize its benefits and minimize its harms."</p><p>The complete article offers more comprehensive analysis of the issues, but as we look forward it is clear that the canaries in the coal mine are getting much louder now as we march more fully into <a href="http://www.corante.com/brainwaves/archives/2004/02/12/lynchs_15_laws_of_the_neurosociety.php">our emerging neurosociety</a>.  It is critical that we move forward with safety being paramount weighed thoughtfully against the life improving potential of these new tools for individual and societal empowerment.</p><a href="http://www.corante.com/brainwaves/archives/2004/02/12/lynchs_15_laws_of_the_neurosociety.php"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Posted by Zack Lynch</b></p><p><strong>In a bold 21st Century declaration</strong>, a group of intelligent, thoughtful and creative neuroethicists have come forward in this week's Nature with a issue defining article calling for the <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/456702a.html">responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy</a>.  Realizing that the age of <a href="http://www.corante.com/brainwaves/archives/2003/10/10/neurocompetitive_advantage.php">neurocompetition</a> is arriving, they (<a href="http://www.law.stanford.edu/directory/profile/27/">Henry Greely</a>, <a href="http://www.psychiatry.cam.ac.uk/pages/profiles/sahakian.html">Barbara Sahakian</a>, <a href="http://www.law.manchester.ac.uk/aboutus/staff/john_harris/default.htm">John Harris</a>, <a href="http://www.hcp.med.harvard.edu/people/hcp_core_faculty/ronald_kessler">Ronald C. Kessler</a>, <a href="http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/~gazzanig/">Michael Gazzaniga</a>, <a href="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/bios/campbell.html">Philip Campbell</a> & <a href="http://www.psych.upenn.edu/~mfarah/">Martha J. Farah</a>) state their case and way forward as follows:</p><p>1.Based on our considerations, we call for a presumption that mentally competent adults should be able to engage in cognitive enhancement using drugs.</p><p>2. We call for an evidence-based approach to the evaluation of the risks and benefits of cognitive enhancement.</p><p>3. We call for enforceable policies concerning the use of cognitive-enhancing drugs to support fairness, protect individuals from coercion and minimize enhancement-related socioeconomic disparities.</p><p>4. We call for a programme of research into the use and impacts of cognitive-enhancing drugs by healthy individuals.</p><p>5. We call for physicians, educators, regulators and others to collaborate in developing policies that address the use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by healthy individuals.</p><p>6. We call for information to be broadly disseminated concerning the risks, benefits and alternatives to pharmaceutical cognitive enhancement.</p><p>7. We call for careful and limited legislative action to channel cognitive-enhancement technologies into useful paths.</p><p> "Like all new technologies, cognitive enhancement can be used well or poorly. We should welcome new methods of improving our brain function. In a world in which human workspans and lifespans are increasing, cognitive enhancement tools  including the pharmacological  will be increasingly useful for improved quality of life and extended work productivity, as well as to stave off normal and pathological age-related cognitive declines. Safe and effective cognitive enhancers will benefit both the individual and society. But it would also be foolish to ignore problems that such use of drugs could create or exacerbate. With this, as with other technologies, we need to think and work hard to maximize its benefits and minimize its harms."</p><p>The complete article offers more comprehensive analysis of the issues, but as we look forward it is clear that the canaries in the coal mine are getting much louder now as we march more fully into <a href="http://www.corante.com/brainwaves/archives/2004/02/12/lynchs_15_laws_of_the_neurosociety.php">our emerging neurosociety</a>.  It is critical that we move forward with safety being paramount weighed thoughtfully against the life improving potential of these new tools for individual and societal empowerment.</p><a href="http://www.corante.com/brainwaves/archives/2004/02/12/lynchs_15_laws_of_the_neurosociety.php"></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://health-and-beauty.orlyowl.net/294-the-case-for-legal-cognitive-enhancement-by-the-healthy.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ZackBorg with EyeSeeCam</title>
		<link>http://health-and-beauty.orlyowl.net/293-zackborg-with-eyeseecam.html</link>
		<comments>http://health-and-beauty.orlyowl.net/293-zackborg-with-eyeseecam.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Uncategorized</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">ngswp43770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted by Zack Lynch</b></p><p>In case you were wondering, I'll try anything once.  Here I am at the Society for Neuroscience conference a few weeks back in DC wearing <a href="http://www.journalofvision.org/8/14/12/article.aspx">EyeSeeCam</a>, a novel head-mounted camera controlled by the user's eye movements. It allows, for the first time, to literally see the world through somebody elses eyes.   </p><p>A mobile eye tracker system continuously directs the camera towards the user's point of gaze, so that the camera captures exactly what the users eyes see. The idea to image such a subjective view is not new  it has a long tradition, for example, in the movie-making industry. Movies like <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0022835/">Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde</a> (1931) and, more recently, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120601/">Being John Malkovich</a> (1999) contain sequences of so-called point-of-view shots. EyeSeeCam takes this technique a major step further; it accurately captures the highly dynamic retinal content of the users visual exploration. <br /><br /> EyeSeeCam is based on the combination of two technologies: an eye tracking and a camera motion device that operates as an artificial eye. The challenges in designing such a system are mobility, high bandwidth, and low total latency. These challenges are met by a newly developed lightweight eye tracker that is able to synchronously measure binocular eye positions at up to 600 Hertz. The camera motion device consists of a parallel kinematics setup with a backlash-free gimbal joint that is driven by piezo actuators with no reduction gears. As a result, the latency between eye rotations and the camera is as low as 10 milliseconds. <br /><br /> EyeSeeCam provides a new tool for fundamental studies in vision research, particularly, on human gaze behavior in the real world. This prototype is a first attempt to combine free user mobility with biological image stabilization and unrestricted exploration of the visual surround in a man-made technical vision system. </p><p>I wore it all around the exhibition floor and as you might imagine ended up in quite a few interesting conversations.  Upon analyzing the video it became apparent that I'm a fan of people's ears and shoes. Go figure.</p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120601/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Posted by Zack Lynch</b></p><p>In case you were wondering, I'll try anything once.  Here I am at the Society for Neuroscience conference a few weeks back in DC wearing <a href="http://www.journalofvision.org/8/14/12/article.aspx">EyeSeeCam</a>, a novel head-mounted camera controlled by the user's eye movements. It allows, for the first time, to literally see the world through somebody elses eyes.   </p><p>A mobile eye tracker system continuously directs the camera towards the user's point of gaze, so that the camera captures exactly what the users eyes see. The idea to image such a subjective view is not new  it has a long tradition, for example, in the movie-making industry. Movies like <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0022835/">Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde</a> (1931) and, more recently, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120601/">Being John Malkovich</a> (1999) contain sequences of so-called point-of-view shots. EyeSeeCam takes this technique a major step further; it accurately captures the highly dynamic retinal content of the users visual exploration. <br /><br /> EyeSeeCam is based on the combination of two technologies: an eye tracking and a camera motion device that operates as an artificial eye. The challenges in designing such a system are mobility, high bandwidth, and low total latency. These challenges are met by a newly developed lightweight eye tracker that is able to synchronously measure binocular eye positions at up to 600 Hertz. The camera motion device consists of a parallel kinematics setup with a backlash-free gimbal joint that is driven by piezo actuators with no reduction gears. As a result, the latency between eye rotations and the camera is as low as 10 milliseconds. <br /><br /> EyeSeeCam provides a new tool for fundamental studies in vision research, particularly, on human gaze behavior in the real world. This prototype is a first attempt to combine free user mobility with biological image stabilization and unrestricted exploration of the visual surround in a man-made technical vision system. </p><p>I wore it all around the exhibition floor and as you might imagine ended up in quite a few interesting conversations.  Upon analyzing the video it became apparent that I'm a fan of people's ears and shoes. Go figure.</p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120601/"></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://health-and-beauty.orlyowl.net/293-zackborg-with-eyeseecam.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Neurosecurity Discussions Needed</title>
		<link>http://health-and-beauty.orlyowl.net/292-global-neurosecurity-discussions-needed.html</link>
		<comments>http://health-and-beauty.orlyowl.net/292-global-neurosecurity-discussions-needed.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Uncategorized</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">ngswp43414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted by Zack Lynch</b></p><p>Jonathan Moreno writes another insightful piece, <a href="http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/11/intelligence-on-the-brain/">Intelligence on the Brain</a> which discusses the need for a new dialogue on neuroresearch and national security.  </p><a href="http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/11/intelligence-on-the-brain/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Posted by Zack Lynch</b></p><p>Jonathan Moreno writes another insightful piece, <a href="http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/11/intelligence-on-the-brain/">Intelligence on the Brain</a> which discusses the need for a new dialogue on neuroresearch and national security.  </p><a href="http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/11/intelligence-on-the-brain/"></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://health-and-beauty.orlyowl.net/292-global-neurosecurity-discussions-needed.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neuroscience Summer Boot Camp 2009 for Non-Scientists, Aug. 2-12</title>
		<link>http://health-and-beauty.orlyowl.net/290-neuroscience-summer-boot-camp-2009-for-non-scientists-aug-2-12.html</link>
		<comments>http://health-and-beauty.orlyowl.net/290-neuroscience-summer-boot-camp-2009-for-non-scientists-aug-2-12.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Uncategorized</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">ngswp43314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted by Zack Lynch</b></p><p>Neuroscience is increasingly relevant to a number of professions and academic disciplines beyond its traditional medical applications. Indeed, for any field in which it is important to understand, predict or influence human behavior, neuroscience will play an increasing role. The <a href="http://neuroethics.upenn.edu/boot_camp.html">Penn Neuroscience Boot Camp</a> is designed to give participants a basic foundation in cognitive and affective neuroscience and to equip them to be informed consumers of neuroscience research. <strong>The Boot Camp faculty consists of leaders in the fields of cognitive and affective neuroscience who are committed to the goal of educating non-neuroscientists</strong>. </p><p><strong>Lawyers, educators, economists and businesspeople, as well as scholars of sociology, philosophy, applied ethics and policy</strong>, are incorporating the concepts and methods of neuroscience into their work. Graduate and professional students, working professionals and college and university faculty are encouraged to apply. The only prerequisites are a grasp of basic statistics and at least a dim recollection of high school biology and physics. (A short set of readings will be made available prior to the Boot Camp to remind you about the essentials.) Participants will be housed on campus in air-conditioned apartment-style suites with private bedrooms. </p><a href="http://neuroethics.upenn.edu/boot_camp.html"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Posted by Zack Lynch</b></p><p>Neuroscience is increasingly relevant to a number of professions and academic disciplines beyond its traditional medical applications. Indeed, for any field in which it is important to understand, predict or influence human behavior, neuroscience will play an increasing role. The <a href="http://neuroethics.upenn.edu/boot_camp.html">Penn Neuroscience Boot Camp</a> is designed to give participants a basic foundation in cognitive and affective neuroscience and to equip them to be informed consumers of neuroscience research. <strong>The Boot Camp faculty consists of leaders in the fields of cognitive and affective neuroscience who are committed to the goal of educating non-neuroscientists</strong>. </p><p><strong>Lawyers, educators, economists and businesspeople, as well as scholars of sociology, philosophy, applied ethics and policy</strong>, are incorporating the concepts and methods of neuroscience into their work. Graduate and professional students, working professionals and college and university faculty are encouraged to apply. The only prerequisites are a grasp of basic statistics and at least a dim recollection of high school biology and physics. (A short set of readings will be made available prior to the Boot Camp to remind you about the essentials.) Participants will be housed on campus in air-conditioned apartment-style suites with private bedrooms. </p><a href="http://neuroethics.upenn.edu/boot_camp.html"></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://health-and-beauty.orlyowl.net/290-neuroscience-summer-boot-camp-2009-for-non-scientists-aug-2-12.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
